Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "upgrade dbt-bigquery and re-generate artifact types" #2570

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 9, 2023

Conversation

atvaccaro
Copy link
Contributor

Reverts #2545

Re-open #2546

Copy link
Contributor

@lauriemerrell lauriemerrell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reverting because dbt job failed today with:

PATCH https://bigquery.googleapis.com/bigquery/v2/projects/cal-itp-data-infra/datasets/staging/tables/stg_gtfs_rt__service_alerts?prettyPrint=false: Policy tags can only be attached to a leaf field.
PATCH https://bigquery.googleapis.com/bigquery/v2/projects/cal-itp-data-infra/datasets/staging/tables/stg_gtfs_rt__trip_updates?prettyPrint=false: Policy tags can only be attached to a leaf field.
PATCH https://bigquery.googleapis.com/bigquery/v2/projects/cal-itp-data-infra/datasets/staging/tables/stg_audit__cloudaudit_googleapis_com_data_access?prettyPrint=false: Policy tags can only be attached to a leaf field.
PATCH https://bigquery.googleapis.com/bigquery/v2/projects/cal-itp-data-infra/datasets/staging/tables/stg_gtfs_schedule__validation_notices?prettyPrint=false: Policy tags can only be attached to a leaf field.

Which we suspect is related to the dbt 1.5 upgrade because of mention of seemingly-similar dbt-labs/dbt-bigquery#673. We do not intentionally set policy tags on any of these columns.

@atvaccaro atvaccaro merged commit 1d1fefb into main May 9, 2023
@atvaccaro atvaccaro deleted the revert-2545-ugprade-dbt-test-contracts branch May 9, 2023 18:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants